Sharing, Freedom, and Egalitarian Living

Some Communal History (Part One)

by Raven

Living collectively and sharing most things has a long, long history.  Scholars are still debating how prehistoric and other tribes lived.

Friedrich Engles (Marx’s collaborator) wrote about what he called “primitive communism”, much of it based on the observations of Lewis Henry Morgan, who studied the Haudensaunee (also known as the Five–and then Six–Nations or the Iroquois).  Some of what Morgan reported has been disputed.

Two anarchist academics (an anthropologist and an archeologist–David Graeber and David Wengrow) in their book, The Dawn of Everything, claim that “primitive communism” and “egalitarian societies” are myths and that the societies that have occurred throughout ancient history and non-Western society are both more complex and more creative than those labels would suggest.

The Davids claimed that “… the world of hunter-gatherers as it existed before the coming of agriculture was one of bold social experiments…” and “Agriculture, in turn, did not mean the inception of private property, nor did it mark an irreversible step toward inequality.  In fact, many of the first farming communities were relatively free of ranks and hierarchies.”

On the other hand, they don’t like the term “egalitarian societies” stating that “no one seems to agree on what the term [equality] actually refers to.”  They go on to look at liberty and the various form of freedom (to move or relocate where you want, to ignore or disobey orders, and to actually change society), but they do point out that “Mutual aid–what many contemporary European observers often referred to as ‘communism’–was seen as the necessary condition for individual autonomy.”

What interests me is the notion of sharing and the question of private property.  Some writers have pointed out that there was a difference for some tribal folks between personal property and private property and some things (such as land) could not be owned.  Further, how did hierarchies emerge?  The Davids point out that “Carole Crumley [an anthropologist now at the Swedish Biodiversity Center] has been pointing this out for years: complex systems don’t have to be organized top-down, either in the natural or in the social world.”

Whether egalitarianism existed in early societies or not, it is something that humans have fought to have for thousands of years.  I will write more on this in Part Two of this survey of history, looking at egalitarian living in the Middle Ages.

Sharing, Freedom, and Egalitarian Living

3 thoughts on “Sharing, Freedom, and Egalitarian Living

  1. Nick's avatar Nick says:

    Re: “The Dawn of Everything”

    Unfortunately, that book lacks credibility and depth.

    In fact “The Dawn of Everything” is a biased disingenuous account of human history (https://www.persuasion.community/p/a-flawed-history-of-humanity & https://offshootjournal.org/untenable-history/) that spreads fake hope (the authors of  “The Dawn” claim human history has not “progressed” in stages, or linearly, and must not end in inequality and hierarchy as with our current system… so there’s hope for us now that it could get different/better again). As a result of this fake hope porn it has been widely praised. It conveniently serves the profoundly sick industrialized world of fakes and criminals. The book’s dishonest fake grandiose title shows already that this work is a FOR-PROFIT, instead a FOR-TRUTH, endeavour geared at the (ignorant gullible) masses.

    Fact is human history since the dawn of agriculture has “progressed” in a linear stage (the “stuck” problem, see below), although not before that (https://www.focaalblog.com/2021/12/22/chris-knight-wrong-about-almost-everything ). This “progress” has been fundamentally destructive and is driven and dominated by “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room” (https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html) which the fake hope-giving authors of “The Dawn” entirely ignore naturally (no one can write a legitimate human history without understanding and acknowledging the nature of humans). And these two married pink elephants are the reason why we’ve been “stuck” in a destructive hierarchy and unequal 2-class system , and will be far into the foreseeable future (the “stuck” question — “the real question should be ‘how did we get stuck?’ How did we end up in one single mode?” or “how we came to be trapped in such tight conceptual shackles” — [cited from their book] is the major question in “The Dawn” its authors never really answer, predictably).

    Worse than that, the Dawn authors actually promote, push, propagandize, and rationalize in that book the unjust immoral exploitive criminal 2-class system that’s been predominant for millennia [https://nevermoremedia.substack.com/p/was-david-graeber-offered-a-deal]!

    One of the “expert” authors, Graeber, has no real idea on what world we’ve been living in and about the nature of humans is his last brief article on Covid where his ignorance shines bright already at the title of his article, “After the Pandemic, We Can’t Go Back to Sleep.” Apparently he doesn’t know that most people WANT to be asleep, and that they’ve been wanting that for thousands of years (and that’s not the only ignorant notion in the title) — see https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html. Yet he (and his partner) is the sort of person who thinks he can teach you something authentically truthful about human history and whom you should be trusting along those terms. Ridiculous!

    “The Dawn” is just another fantasy, or ideology, cloaked in a hue of  cherry-picked “science,” served lucratively to the gullible ignorant public who craves myths and fairy tales.

    “Far too many worry about possibilities more than understanding reality.” — E.J. Doyle, American songwriter & social critic, 2021

    “The evil, fake book of anthropology, “The Dawn of Everything,” … just so happened to be the most marketed anthropology book ever. Hmmmmm.” — Unknown

    Like

Leave a comment