To Boldly Go… Where Many Have Dreamed Before

By GPaul (also just published on the Point A website)

At this point a cultural icon around the world, Star Trek is known for its futuristic tech, its memorable lines and characters, the adventures of the crew, and its noble and optimistic opinion of humanity. But standing quietly in the background of all the Star Trek TV shows and movies is a very radical set of economic assumptions and propositions more relevant to the humanity of the present than futuristic tech like transparent aluminum or even tricorders. The radical economics of Star Trek were recently given thorough treatment in a new book, Trekonomics, by author and nerd Manu Saadia. In the book, Saadia makes a point and distinction of particular interest to those of us working to organize a deeply egalitarian and democratic economy and society.

Trekonomics from Inkshares on Vimeo.

The United Federation of Planets operates without money and without markets, a point referenced repeatedly by the crew members. The Federation is, in Saadia’s words, “post-economic”, his preferred way of characterizing their post-scarcity society. “Economics is the management of scarcity,” says Saadia. “With Star Trek, at least inside the Federation, you have basically overcome what [John Meynard] Keynes called, ‘The Economic Problem,’ … the allocation of scarce resources.” It’s easy to see how this is possible in a world with replicators capable of synthesizing anything that a Federation citizen might desire. What’s important to note, though, is that replicators were only introduced in Star Trek: The Next Generation. Even in the pre-replicator world of Star Trek (The Original Series) money and the market have been abandoned as barbaric relics from a less civilized and less humanistic era. In Star Trek, the movement beyond economics is presented not as the result of some cornucopia of technological automation but rather as a policy choice… and as a strongly moral policy choice, at that. The fact that the Federation’s movement beyond economics is a choice continues to be made throughout the various shows by the existence of technologically comparable societies (epitomized by the Ferengi) where money, the market, and scarcity still obviously exist.

Some people just really love money. (All screenshots by Eric Grundhauser via Atlas Obscura)

The flip side of scarcity is abundance, the state of having enough or more than enough of what everyone needs. It is a utopian material condition that many have dreamed of and sought throughout human history and across political traditions. What is described here in Star Trek are the two general methods of approaching abundance. We might call them demand side abundance and supply side abundance. Supply side abundance is the easier one to imagine and is embodied by the post-replicator Star Trek. The means of production have developed to the point that an infinitesimal amount of human labor is transformed into an infinitude of materials goods. It no longer makes sense to talk about prices when your costs are essentially zero. Without the need to manage scarcity the market fades away as product after product is decommodified. It is the communism described by Marx as the near inevitable result of Capitalism’s drive towards mechanization. Our friends, Las Indias, have done a lot of good work exploring the ways in which this form of abundance is beginning to breach into our world, the challenges it poses to the status quo, and the opportunities it presents to egalitarian communalists (see their by donation ebook The Book of Abundance or The Communard Manifesto).

Picard is served a potted plant by a malfunctioning replicator. (All screenshots by Eric Grundhauser via Atlas Obscura)

However, as exciting as a dawning age of supply side abundance is, what I find even more exciting is demand side abundance. By this I mean the world of abundance that is already available to us and has been, pretty consistently, for a very long time. As the stone soup story suggests and as Bucky Fuller calculated the existence of scarcity in the world is not a problem of production but a problem of distribution. But when we talk about distribution in this way we’re really talking about something bigger. We’re talking about Demand or how decisions are made and priorities are set not just around who gets the stuff that is produced but about what is produced in the first place and how it is distributed and made available. Like how we, as a species, decide how many Ferraris are produced versus how much malaria medicine. Or how we decide where we pile up food and when it gets thrown out. Or how much to spend on lawyers to fight health insurance claims versus how much to spend on health care. Any number of decisions, really. The idea hinted at by pre-replicator Star Trek, and the idea clearly explored by Ursula K. LeGuin in The Dispossessed, is how a society can choose to create abundance even in a situation with limited resources. That is to say, how a society can choose to make sure that everyone has enough of what they need. The path that LeGuin’s moon anarchists take is the same path taken by our very real and present day Federation of Egalitarian Communities. That path is one that both works to make distribution as efficient as possible (by extensive sharing, intensive cooperation and coordination, and the removal of barriers to access) while at the same time thinking critically about what is needed to live a good life and, as much as possible, finding non-materialist paths to satisfaction and enrichment. This is what makes LeGuin’s anarchists a peaceful and rich people despite living on an isolated desert planet with very scarce resources and it is what makes the communes of the Federation able to provide comfortable, secure, and satisfying lives (of an arguable middle class or upper middle class quality) on sub-poverty level incomes. It is an abundance that is available to all of us right now if we can change the way that we relate to each other and to our economy.

We are living science fiction. May our message of peace and abundance one day reach the earth… and finally the stars.

The Federation is on its way. (All screenshots by Eric Grundhauser via Atlas Obscura)

To Boldly Go… Where Many Have Dreamed Before

3 thoughts on “To Boldly Go… Where Many Have Dreamed Before

  1. jbird says:

    yo! Gpaul, good article. it brought to mind al franken’s supply side jesus. this article forces me to consider the demand side jesus and what he would be like in contrast to supply side jesus.


  2. Zanstel says:

    In fact I think that supply side are never enough to fulfill really the objetive of postscarcity. Because in the real world, although labor costs could be reach zero value through extensive automation (probably in near future), resources like metal, energy, etc. although abundant are not unlimited.
    And a population without demand side control will push a generous state of resources to the limit until scarcity reapears.

    In fact, we face a complex future, where labor costs are goind down, but non-replicable resources (like oil, copper, phosphorous…) could be scarce. Population levels could be very near the environment limits (by total food production capacity of the Earth).

    So we would need wisdom to limit our population and demand.

    But at the same time, as we achieve high levels of automation, complete renewable energy base, close circle usage of materials, etc. we could reach a steady state of good quality life.

    Demand (self)control would reach that any supply improvement would mean greater quality life, and the drop of labor demand push us to rebuild the society about goals out of actual values. Not to see successfull lifes through material accumulation but selfdevelopment.
    Obviously that could only be possible if reasonable (enough) quality life has been reached and guaranteed. But beyond that, accumulate things are only a plummet in our lifes (and the others, pushing more pressure in the common limited resources).

    So both sides are important. Supply side to guarantee to reach a “unexhaustible” (although limited) stream of energy and resources at zero labor costs so we could guarantee these tolerable levels where all we could work in the demand side with no important material deprivation.
    Demand side controls (like birthcontrol, education in good values, etc.) would ensure that the supply side has limited value and we don’t require to push it again to higher levels.

    Money is a external way of demand side control. But it doesn’t work well in all cases.
    Perhaps it would better in the future to propose new demand controls. The more intrinsic (by personal choose), the better. But external mechanism like “resource quotas” (similar, but not equal) could be a good tool to avoid that a small part of the population overstock the demand.

    A lot of work is needed to reach this ideal postscarcity future.


  3. Allen Butcher says:

    Great that you wrote this, GPaul. I have been thinking about this since at least when we built the building called “Enterprise” at East Wind. Thanks for getting my thoughts on paper (the Internet), better than I could have written it!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s